Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees use.
In addition it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and 120 from the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
The a lot of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made clear that police is free to take action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities topic to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-area duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
As a result, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these types of an appeal has not still been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner could then seek further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Though there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds little sway. Still, if there is not any precedent inside the home state, relevant case law from another state can be regarded from the court.
PLR is often a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Because of this, simply citing the case is more more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think about it as calling another person to inform them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in such-and-these kinds of neighborhood, without actually providing them an address. Driving throughout the community seeking to find their phone is likely for being more frustrating than it’s worth.
10. Without touching the merits of your case on the issue of once-a-year increases while in the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, such annual increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, needs further assessment being made from the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a consequence of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
The law of necessity regarded and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair for the offender plus the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
ten. Based around the findings with the inquiry committee, this petition is not really regarded as maintainable and is therefore liable to generally be dismissed, which is dismissed accordingly with pending application(s) if any. Read more
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent and the case under appeal, Probably overruling the previous case regulation by setting a different precedent of higher authority. This could come about several times since the case works its way through successive get more info appeals. Lord Denning, first of the High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his growth in the concept of estoppel starting during the High Trees case.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is additionally a well-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty with the charge, however, that is matter on the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.